Guidelines for Operating by Consensus

by Frank Jernigan

Goal: To glorify God by enabling him to lead us corporately into wise decisions - being of one mind together.

Definition: Consensus is virtual unanimity: almost every person agrees and those who don't have come to the place where they can at least bury their objections and in good faith go along.

Two errors to avoid:

1. Not speaking one's insights and concerns because of a premature assumption that consensus has been reached.
2. Continuing to speak a divergent opinion after consensus has been reached.

To discern whether to speak or not, ask yourself:

1. Do I sincerely believe I have a better idea that has not been heard and understood?
2. Do I sincerely object to the current proposal on the grounds that it is personally too offensive, threatening, or objectionable?

A definite ``yes'' means that you need to speak even though it may appear that consensus has been reached. A ``no'' or ``maybe'' means you should not speak even though your idea may not have been presented in the discussion. Remember, the goal is to discern God's will through unity of mind, not to make sure that every divergent opinion is expressed.

Procedure: a proposal ³ discussion ³ consensus

When speaking an opposing point of view during the discussion phase, whenever possible seek to present a positive alternative rather than simply criticizing the current idea.

Consider the possibility of discussing topics one meeting after the meeting where the topic or issue is presented, especially when the topic is of major importance. Alternatively, consider putting a proposal in writing and distributing it to all well before the meeting.

Feel free to postpone a decision to the next meeting - the consensus process takes time, and sometimes only time will help.

Version 3.2

As of 26 December 1996